#oppressionobsession

Time indulges another totalitarian voice for the 2019 Person of the Year

16yo climate alarmist Greta Thunberg defines our age. As many of you know, she has been awarded Time’s 2019 Person of the Year. Sort of fitting given the magazine has a tendency to hand it to those that speak in totalitarian tones (not her own of course). Recently, she dropped the following statement,

After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them all. Our political leaders can no longer shirk their responsibilities.

One doesn’t have to be a teenager either to formulate such views. It wasn’t so long ago that an 11-yo implored all climate activists to go beyond the battle for global warming and fight for gun control, LGBTQ+ rights and to demand that her teachers can receive a living wage. How dare we even question where she got such thoughts! Kids just know better than we selfish adults (who used to recycle milk bottles, wash diapers and push lawnmowers) who have trashed their planet!

FNFM has always felt pity for poor Greta and written so on multiple occasions. She has been systematically abused by authoritarian adults to push their ridiculous globalist agenda. Knowing that it is uncool to attack a kid, she makes the perfect human shield. She is the participation trophy personified. Her “how dare you” assertions are never challenged by the media who toss softball questions to further deify this high priestess of the climate change movement. We must not challenge and inevitably we will probably lose our right to do so thanks to the cancel culture amongst the youth today. Such blasphemy won’t be tolerated.

No one can deny the passion with which she has embraced her cause even if not completely aware of the hypocrisy created by it. While the gesture of sailing on carbon-based yachts across the Atlantic and back to save the planet in order to slash her carbon footprint was noble, the reality is that she would have lowered the aggregate carbon footprint by jumping a scheduled flight that was taking off anyway. Why, because the boat owners had to fly sailors across the ocean to make it a reality. Yet we can calculate her potential impact:

If we assume Greta’s weight around 35-40kg, it would mean she would add 0.016% to the fuel calculations a Boeing 777 pilot would have to account for. Her impact would be so minuscule as to beggar belief.

280 million trips were made by commercial aircraft last year according to the IATA. Her transatlantic return flight would only be 2 of those meaning she would represent 0.000000714% of all annual flights taken.

Given that airlines, by the IATA’s own stats, annually produce the equivalent to 2% of all man-made emissions or 0.000016% in total, her two flights would make up around 0.0000000000114%. That is slightly unfair as the journey would be longer than most flights (predominantly short-haul). So if e bumped it 4-fold, her return trip would have penalized the planet 0.0000000000007314%.

Thunberg has amassed 3.2m Twitter followers. It is an incredible feat in and of itself. However, FNFM worries that with all of this social media exposure, when none of the prophetic doom and gloom she parrots comes to pass by the deadlines set by climate alarmists, she might realise she has been summarily duped by the very people who have actually “stolen her childhood.”

Unfortunately, she is blissfully blind to being amidst the epicentre of 27,000 hypocritical climate catastrophists at the COP25 summit, most of who flew in to tell us how we all must save the planet (on their behalf). In that sense, it is wonderful to know there is still some innocence left.

If only she knew that her climate change evangelism has thrust the ‘save the planet‘ agenda back on the map, leading to the 21% surge in delegates over the Katowice (COP24) conference. If she wants to fight against those who have “stolen her dreams” they are right in front of her.

Many of her critics suggest she should go back to school. FNFM disagrees. What is the point of sending Greta back to the very institutions that planted the seeds of this Marxist indoctrination in the first place?

To be honest, if we are to submit to the whims of teenagers who know all there is to know, we should close down our universities because there is simply no value in tertiary education, especially now that these centres for open thinking are muzzling it on campus.

Maybe one day, when Greta has a teenager of her own (assuming she doesn’t try to avoid having kids to save the planet), she will see for herself what we knew all along.

As the old saying goes. “Experience is a hard teacher. You get the test first and the lesson afterwards.

A message to Australia’s local councils

As yet another local council strays out of its lane to appear woke over Australia Day, Jonathan Pie has a message for them. Put simply, these people are finding sources of oppression where none exist. CM wrote about this over the Inner West Council in Sydney’s plan to ditch Australia Day. The survey which the decision was based was laughable. 35 people out of 200,000 were asked.

It is unlikely that any residents in Wanneroo would deny a broadening of cultural festivities but what is it with these radical left councils that think the best way to promote inclusivity is by exclusion for the rest? Take it away Jonathan!

Inner West Council to host the 2020 Oppression Olympics

Image result for victim card

Who would have ever imagined that the left-leaning Inner-West Council (IWC) would push to change the celebration of Australia Day which, according to Mayor Darcy Byrne, marks “for Aboriginal people, the beginning of colonisation, dispossession and the removal of children, the deliberate destruction of language and culture, there is a better and more mature way to commemorate the day that includes them.” to an Aboriginal festival called Yabun (which means music to a beat)?

What is this obsession with local councils to act in this way? Residents just require them to collect rubbish, make sure loo paper is replenished in local park lavatories and mow the lawns. If one bothers to read through the annual reports of these local councils one can see just how much spare time these people have on their hands. It is insane.

Take the Northern Beaches Council claim that it had saved 293 tonnes of carbon in the council area in the 2017-18 period. Put it against Australia’s CO2 impact vs the entire atmosphere meant that Northern Beaches hammered home a mammoth 0.000000000699857% saving! Yes 9 zeroes. How much hot air was wasted in meetings on that initiative? The ultimate irony was the cover of the Annual Report displayed its least fuel-efficient vehicle!

Or Ryde Council’s climate emergency! Referring to the Ryde Council Annual Report 2018 financials section one can see that it spent on what it terms “Environmental Programs” a grand sum of $547,000, down from $556,000 the previous year. To put that in context of budget expenditure, this climate change fearing council spent, wait for it, 0.34% of the total annual revenue on saving the planet. Ryde Council even grandstanded with,

This includes a commitment to divest its investment portfolio from fossil fuel-aligned financial institutions, supporting renewable and clean energy solutions and becoming one of the first councils to phase out single-use plastics.

The irony was that Ryde Council’s financial details list it has next to nothing in investments outside of fixed interest product. Beat that chest but beware of the medals you’ve pinned to yourselves as you sip lentil smoothies through a paper straw.

Back to IWC. In order to deal with the supposed oppression of 2,038 indigenous Australians out of 198,024 residents (i.e. 1% of the local population), did the IWC think to publish the tidal wave of complaints from this minority that demanded the move? Or did IWC do as the Yarra Council did in Melbourne and survey their mates to get the result they wanted? Recall Yarra councillors backed the Australia Day ban recommendations by pointing to an online survey of 88 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, with 82% of respondents supportive of the change. Another 281 people were polled in a separate street survey, with 45.9% agreeing council should support the campaign.

In fact, it was even worse. IWC sought feedback after the 2019 Australia Day event and 37  (thirty-seven) people – “19%” of whom identified as Aboriginal – responded to an online survey, with most opposed to holding a celebratory Australia Day event. Most? 19 people would be a technical majority. So 0.0096% of the residents opposed it. Must be considered a landslide by the IWC?

If these IWC councillors are so triggered by Australia Day and the mistreatment of minorities two centuries ago, perhaps they should sack all 1,038 council staff members and hand them over to the original owners of the land as an overt sign of destroying the white patriarchy and atoning for the sins of people they had no relationship to who did things to others before they were born?

But of course, as ever with the identity politics driven left, creating oppression where none exists is a forte. Why not just embrace the idea that 196,000 other residents would probably be more than happy to have the inclusion of Yabun without the exclusion of everyone else.

Alas, this is the Australia CM has returned to after 20 years. Everyone trying to outdo the other in the moral preening stakes. We are a complete laughing stock. Sadly, we accept too much of this nonsense which only eggs on activists to push for ever more ridiculous demands.

As Thomas Sowell once said,

“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.”

Indeed if IWC see these people as perpetual victims perhaps they can reflect that charity is injurious unless it helps the recipient to become independent of it.

First time CM has read Apple’s software update

Good to see Apple has catered to the utter obsession with oppression by introducing “gender neutral” emojis. The world is a safer place. Honestly, if there are people that maybe triggered by an emoji what has the world come to? Presumably vegans will be up in arms until the egg has been removed from the salad emoji! Perhaps ban the meat emojis because that is an injustice to animals.

CM unreservedly apologises to teenagers, mutants, ninjas & turtles

Image result for time magazine brown face

CM unreservedly apologises to all teenagers, mutants, ninjas and turtles for wearing a TMNT costume 28 years ago. CM hopes no one was offended by pretending to be 19 when I was actually 20 at the time. It was inappropriate and CM deeply regrets the use of the word “Cowabunga, dudes” when referring to Amanda and Claire outside the ANU Refectory.

For the record, CM cannot stand Justin Trudeau on so many levels. From the use of the word, ‘people kind‘ to cardboard cutouts of himself sent to Canadian embassies around the world. The worst of all has been his meddling in the SNC Lavalin affair of which he was found guilty.

However, the liberal media meltdown over Justin Trudeau for wearing brown face at an Arabian Nights costume party in 2001 is taking faux outrage to new levels. Isn’t the point of “fancy dress” to look as close as possible to the character one is trying to mimic? The journalists talking about “regret”. Could they be any more pathetic?

Remember the poor kid who idolized Nic Naitanui, (a coloured AFL player) so much so he went to great lengths to look identical to his hero? All she was doing was trying to pretend to be the man she clearly looked up to. There was no hint of racism to be found yet the mob descended to pillory the poor lass. Nic even tweeted that he was touched by the gesture before the Twitterati bullied him into suggesting he needed to be educated about his own culture. Surely the litmus test is that if he wasn’t offended, why should anyone else be?

In 2019, basically, everything is off-limits. Lots of terrible things happened decades ago. However, to push hard in the oppression olympics seems all that matters these days. The effort to achieve the gold medal in victimhood is something to aspire to.

As much as CM can not stand Trudeau, his actions were unlikely at any time to be insensitive, racially motivated or intentionally hurtful. So for once Justin, you should just tell people to get a life.

If any person of any colour makes fun of CM as a white man with a receding hairline, slightly bulging waistline and poor dress sense, CM will not be in the least bit offended. CM, if instructed by the Twitterati, will issue an unconditional apology for decades of white privilege and express deep regret over the trauma caused by people who lived 100 years before CM was born and has no relation.

Maybe the best way to sort out the faux outrage mob is to demand that their past of 20 years ago is brought up and blasted around the world. Jonathan Pie summed up the oppression obsession best here.

”New Balls, Please”

Forget 135 years of tradition. Let’s pander to politically correct identity nonsense where there is zero need for it. What is it with the faux outrage mob that leads the England Lawn Tennis Club (ELTC) to feel pressured to “move with the times”? Whose times exactly? Does the ELTC honestly believe people might be triggered by the use of “Mrs” or “Miss” when they win a game, set or match? Even Hawkeye would roll its eyes at this clear “out.”

Tell you what, why not ask each individual tennis player what their preferred pronoun is and have the umpire address them accordingly. Here is betting that none of the players will request a change to basic biology and marital status.

To be honest if the height of oppression for the LGBTQI+ community extends to the umpires calling a game at Wimbledon, one suspects we are beyond the threshold of grievance that will change anything on margin.

If the ELTC wishes to push the “equality” ticket, perhaps they should dispense with the tournament being split by gender? Why stop at pronouns? No point being half “woke”

Will the ELTC lead the way to allow those men who identify as women to go head-to-head with Williams, Barty or Osaka? Why not? If they know they’ll never beat Rafa, Federer or Djokovic why not seek equality elsewhere by cheating a system the championship convener will end up encouraging to “move with the times.”

Time the fans asked the ELTC for “new balls please“.

If you’re going to do it then stop the damn subtlety

5B00FFB0-3D84-43AA-A06F-0567222DACBE.jpeg

What is the obsession Hollywood has of trying to either wipe history or work to overlay irrelevance to rewrite it? Quit the subtle overtones. Just explicitly state your intent and let the free market box office judge it. When it comes to factual recreations like Dunkirk what is the point of wailing there were not enough people of colour in it when history shows us 99% of those that served were white? What does this achieve? Why not complain that 50% of the cast weren’t women waiting for the boats in the film? Probably because 99.9% on Dunkirk were men.

The latest Star Wars film was all about social justice, equality and identity. It has been a flop. Why can’t we just see a movie with lasers and goodies vs baddies? Should we fear alienating the LGBT Ewok community? Perhaps the sand people are really misunderstood minorities not terrorists? Shouldn’t Jabba the Hut seek compensation for decades of fat shaming? It is insane. Funnily enough when studying the box office takings we don’t need to look far to see the winners of the “Best Picture” selected by Hollywood in recent times have far undershot records. $100m box offices were a cert for an Oscar Best Picture award til 2004 after which it has been hit and miss since. 9 films in the last 13 have failed to breach $75mn. So instead of Hollywood being so preoccupied with espousing politics, perhaps it should look to the audience it ‘preaches’ to and starts ‘reaching’ them instead.

These are the Oscar stats. A 40% decline in viewers over 5 years. Is this a sign of a format that is no longer sustainable? Is the disintermediation/disruption caused by video on demand such that making a ‘date’ to go to the cinema is no longer a priority? Cinema attendance in the domestic US market is back at 1993 levels. In the 1990s Hollywood made 400-500 films annually. It now pumps out more than 700. The average revenue per film continues to head south.

So Man on the Moon depicts the story of Neil Armstrong. The film leaves out the historic and defining moment of planting the flag (a sign of American exceptionalism) some 50 years ago in beating arch enemy Russia in the space race. In 1969, had a straw poll of Americans (and much of the world) been taken at that moment it would have undoubtedly reflected unbridled pride in achievement. Many around the world must have looked at America in awe. What on earth is wrong with that? It was a stunning achievement and feat of ingenuity, science and invention.

Canadian actor Ryan Gosling, who plays Armstrong, said the moon landing “transcended countries and borders.” To a degree he is right. The world stood still on that day. Walter Cronkite had tears in his eyes. Yert should Jamaicans feel guilty that Usain Bolt won the 100m & 200m finals in three consecutive Olympics? There is no doubt the world looked in awe of him grinning with shoelaces untied as he jogged to the finish line. Yet for Jamaicans it was an extra dollop of pride. Great!

However Gosling’s defence of leaving out the flag scene was to cast aspersions on America. It is part of this new breed of Hollywood loathing of everything good. Where globalism trumps national pride. If the producers of this film hate America so much why not make the movie about a conspiracy theory that the moon landing was faked? Alternatively make Armstrong a disabled, black, transgender Muslim to ensure enough PC boxes are ticked to please the apparatchiks?

CM only requests Hollywood quits with subtle jabs at success and openly embraces its quest for shared misery and the rewriting of history. Only then will they see their box office numbers judge their stupidity. Grow up! Understand that pride in one’s country, flag, job, study or whatever else is to be encouraged. We need more of it not Hollywood’s obsession with oppression.