#kimgardner

Portland Prosecutor’s clown show

Who knew? Days after Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler (Democrat) admitted peaceful protestors who tried to burn buildings with people inside were “committing murder“, his District Attorney Mike Schmidt said that most rioters wouldn’t be prosecuted.

Fear not, there is good reason for that. The newly elected DA is an avowed SJW who has been endorsed by Black Lives Matter co-founder Shaun “Talcom X” King’s political action committee, Real Justice PAC. Its goals include the ending of cash bail, the opening of prisons, and the defunding of police. What could possibly go wrong?

The list of crimes which wouldn’t cause charges to be laid includes:

• interfering with a police officer

• disorderly conduct

• criminal trespass

• harassment

• escape in the 3rd degree

• riot (sometimes in some circumstances)

All forgiven and forgotten.

Never mind that 500 arrested. Why so lenient? It was the “police” that caused rioters to react because they used tear gas or other crowd-control measures causing rioters to “instinctively lash out.

We wonder how the conversations between insurance companies and local businesses will go down when criminals will be slapped on the wrist with a feather duster.

What a joke! Add this to the other activists pretending to be impartial. We wrote about that here.

Utterly Sinister

It seems that the St Louis County Attorney’s office ordered the crime lab to fiddle with the evidence before pressing charges against the McCloskeys.

The crime lab was ordered to disassemble the non operable pistol and reassemble it so CA Gardner’s office could classify it as “capable of lethal use.”

While Missouri AG Eric Schmitt is recommending the case be dismissed, one has to question just how sinister Democrat St Louis CA Kim Gardner is to recommend her office doctor facts to fit her own twisted political narrative and punish law abiding citizens that have never committed any crime.

As we reported yesterday, Gardner made no attempt to prosecute a man who confessed to killing a 7yo boy because of a supposed ‘lack of evidence.’

Perhaps Gardner should be forced to take mandatory ethics classes, much like Obama’s DOJ.

St Louis CA finds insufficient evidence despite suspect confessing he killed 7yo

While St Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberley Gardner was only too happy hunt for any reason to prosecute the McCloskeys for defending their property with legally possessed firearms, she couldn’t find it in her heart to charge Malik Ross for the murder of 7yo Xavier Usanga even though he confessed.

You have to wonder how someone who has a responsibility to dispense justice fairly can have such warped standards.

The day after the murder of Usanga, prosecutors say Ross stole $50,000 from the armored truck business he worked for, all in an alleged attempt to flee the city for six months.

You can read CA Gardner’s letter about trying to get justice for young Xavier. The first paragraph says it all. We’re not quite sure how confessing to a shooting counts as insufficient evidence.

Missouri AG seeks to dismiss McCloskey case

Missouri AG Eric Schmitt is seeking to dismiss the McCloskey case on the grounds for what it is – a political hit job.

Who knew self-defence carried a 4-yr jail term?

img_6127

Never mind the right to defend oneself if the circuit attorney is an activist hell-bent on twisting the law to fit an agenda. St Louis CA Kim Gardner said at the time of the incident that she would find something in Missouri law to prosecute the McCloskeys, the couple who kept 300 “peaceful protestors” who forced entry onto private property with an AR-15 and a pistol.

Apparently, she is classifying the self-defence as a felony which carries up to a four-year jail term. Never mind that they had been threatened with being murdered and their property being burnt to the ground. The police couldn’t attend and private security didn’t want to be involved. No shots were fired. Nobody was hurt.

Still, CA Gardner, so eager to stop systemic racism found no fault with what she claims is a white on black crime. Never mind that the mob comprised of many racial backgrounds. Never mind that they were trespassing. Forget that they broke the gate. Forget the tweet where one of the mob leaders openly intended to trash the McCloskey’s property. What did race have to do with it? If the McCloskeys were anything other than white, Garnder wouldn’t have sought to press charges??

If the radical left mobsters had the mandate to promote the 2nd Amendment they couldn’t have done a better job.

We think such wilfully activist judiciaries only help put Trump back in the White House in November. If a couple is going to be prosecuted for defending private property, what hope has anyone got of getting a fair trial? The only way to stop it is to vote it out.

Utterly shameless. Welcome to identity politics under the law. 2020 is so twisted that somehow equality under the law is now viewed as discrimination. Please note we wrote about activist DAs earlier this month. Please refer to this link.

Warrant served on St Louis couple that defended their home

St Louis law enforcement has served a warrant on the McCloskeys, the couple that defended their home and confiscated the automatic rifle that was used to defend it after 300 protestors trespassed on private property. We wrote about activist DAs here.

How wonderful that the government decided to treat them as the common criminals even though McCloskey had an official permit for the weapon and has no history of committing any felonies.

Presumably the Democratic Mayor and DA can celebrate if the McCloskey family home burns to the ground. They have since had to hire private security.

Talk about government overreach. This is what the Democrats are signaling they want for ordinary, hard working Americans. Shut up and fall into line.

As Mark D Robison once said, “I’m the majority…yet every time something happens we’re the last ones considered and the first ones punished.”

In California opposing a Marxist group is now a hate crime

California, true to form, showed its totalitarian roots.

A couple that painted over a Black Lives Matter mural that was approved by the city of Martinez have been charged with a hate crime. The release notes “defacing” with “black paint” which somehow relates to “systemic racism.” We imagine that given bitumen is black, that colour paint was the best hue to mask the mural.

Who knew that opposing a Marxist group is now a federal offense in California?

Unfortunately we had another woke District Attorney Diana Becton flex her political beliefs in the statement rather than apply the law objectively. Where have we seen this before? Three examples spring to mind.

1) Fulton County DA Paul Howard is pushing the death penalty for former Atlanta Police officer Garrett Rolfe in the death of Rayshard Brooks despite the evidence. How convenient that he is up for re-election and fighting allegations of sexual harassment and a toxic work environment. Also note that The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) has opened an investigation of Howard and his use of a nonprofit to funnel at least $140,000 in city of Atlanta funds to supplement his salary.

2) Cook County State Attorney Kim Foxx ruled emphatically that Empire actor Jussie Smollett was guilty beyond doubt but dropped all 16 charges related to his hate crime hoax despite the unnecessary $100,000 cost to the Chicago Police. How ironic that Michelle Obama’s former chief-of-staff called Foxx to discuss the concern of the Smollett family. Foxx never recused herself on conflict of interest grounds, however the end result certainly gives rise to suspicions favours were called in.

3) St Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner said she would find a way to charge the McCloskeys for defending their home with automatic weapons when 500 BLM protestors trespassed on their gated private property. Gardner said, “Make no mistake: we will not tolerate the use of force against those exercising their First Amendment rights, and will use the full power of Missouri law to hold [the McCloskeys] accountable.”

Forget objective judiciary’s when DAs are unabashed activists.

As an aside, all four attorneys listed above are Democrats that happen to be black. This is an observation based on fact.

We are confident that there have been activist attorneys of other party affiliations and races over the years. So much for independence and fair trials when DAs push for an outcome without the presumption of innocence. A sad indictment indeed.

Surely to end systemic racism, applying laws based on identity won’t be the answer.