#climatefraud

Seattle City Council strikes again

We want proper evidence to convince us that the state of climate change is anywhere near as big or as dangerous as alarmists claim it to be. This video doesn’t help convince those who want more proof.

Seattle City Council is a gift that keeps giving. Not just the tree activists singing but the complete “don’t give a damn” attitude of the councilors.

Zali better pray that politicians don’t judge her climate bill on the results of Warringah

FNF Media was curious as to how the tally for Warringah MP Zali Steggall OAM’s ‘Roadmap to Zero‘ (R2Z) worked. As is often the case with these grassroots woke causes, the structure of the claims can be misleading. Amateur data collection methodology can undermine the very cause. We reveal how easy it is.

R2Z currently claims 551 ‘households’ have signed up from the 66 when we first looked into it earlier in the week. Technically this would mean that 0.8% of households in the Warringah electorate have signed her compact, up from 0.1%.

To turn that on its head, Steggall, who ran on a campaign of climate change, can’t seem to get the other 99% of households in the electorate over the line to sign up to R2Z.

Looking deeper into the sign-up process we found it only involved one’s email, name and postcode. That’s all. So one could technically live in Newtown, input a Mosman postcode and sign up. There doesn’t seem to be a process to cross-reference the signatories to the electoral roll.

One would think if the honourable member wished to truly get an accurate map of where the more environmentally conscious residents lived, a fixed address may have been a more useful process to ensure that the inputs were a) legitimate and b) where resources might need to be focused. Easy to have people tick a “privacy” waiver if indeed they are passionate enough to save the planet.

It is a bit hard to claim ‘household’ when one’s full address can’t be logged. There is nothing stopping all members of the same household signing up of the same person using multiple emails. This just reduces the quality of the data collection from a statistical perspective.

As awful as 0.8% of households is, 0.35% of the 147,333 Warringah residents is even worse.

Beyond the fact that 99% of her own electorate seemingly doesn’t care for R2Z, The Guardian ignores that and concludes,

The woman who toppled Tony Abbott in Warringah at the last election on a platform of climate change action now has the whole parliament in her sights as she seeks bipartisan support for a climate change framework bill aimed at transitioning Australia to a decarbonised economy.”

She won on a platform to remove Tony Abbott.

Ironically The Guardian includes her R2Z link as a “conscience vote” which sort of undermines the argument,

Steggall and the crossbench have begun a conscience vote campaign online and within their communities. They hope to win over enough government MPs to see the bill, which has been modelled on existing legislation in the UK, New Zealand and Ireland, pass in Australia.

She better pray politicians don’t judge her bill on the strength of the commitment of the residents or households of Warringah.

FNF Media endorses Steggall’s view reported by The Guardian

With the government’s party room once again at war over climate policy, Steggall said it was time to let individual MPs speak for their communities rather than toe a party line.”

Warringah has spoken, even with the risk of dodgy data collection. Mickey Mouse awaits updates on how to save the planet.

“Climate change” Casanova

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again.

While the alarmist media continues its attack dog mission on PM Scott Morrison over the bushfires, they overlook the most glaring hole in the argument of the fire chiefs – consistency.

If former FR NSW chief Greg Mullins truly believes that “climate change” is such a critical issue, why was the subject absent for so many years in the annual reports which were submitted to parliament that he oversaw? Surely he had the perfect opportunity to raise awareness year after year on the topic. Yet he didn’t.

Annual reports are like an opus magnum. They document the key opportunities and challenges for an organization. In Mullins’ case, the mention of climate change is conspicuous by its very absence. In the 2018/19 FRNSW annual report there is a reference to climate change by way of voluntary participation in Earth Hour. Hardly a detail oriented study on the effects of bushfires and global warming!

Now that Mullins is in cahoots with the Climate Council, it is very convenient to drum up ‘awareness’ on climate change post the bushfires for a Royal Commission (RC). Forget that 95% of a RC would probably draw on the exact same advice garnered from 57 former enquire since 1939.

Our belief is that incompetence has reigned supreme. Fire department senior management seemed more engaged on ticking the diversity & inclusion box (please see data in the above link) in annual reports than providing rich data on the core business i.e. preventing and extinguishing fires.

That is to take nothing away from the brave fireys who risk their lives on the front line. As some volunteer firefighters have made clear, they think the senior management act like a mafia.

For Mullins to use the get out of jail free card of climate change in any RC by saying it will ‘fail at the first step’ without is ridiculous.

To include it now should highlight the media by years of exclusion when he had the authority and opportunity to do something but didn’t. Why? Will anyone ask this question? Not with our powderpuff mainstream media.

Statistically speaking, to introduce climate change in the 58th review in 81 years would smack of being an outlier. Outliers shouldn’t be ignored but they must be viewed in context of the relatives of intensity, area burned, fuel loads, hazard management, weather conditions, people and machines deployed. It is likely that these fires will be less than one standard deviation off the mean which effectively would conclude that climate change wouldn’t be a driver.

Climate change is now a phrase of convenience tossed around more frequently than Casanova telling girls they are “the only one” on Valentines Day.

Smug?

This comment from Lisa Wilkinson is about as smug as it gets.

ABC Q&A’s audience, true to form, showed the exact opposite. If climate alarmists truly oozed common sense they would actively listen to the opposing view and smash it with hard evidence. The very fact they don’t tells us much.

99% of the audience wont know the statistics in the below links which bring to light the very argument of Senator Jim Molan to question the data.

Lisa Wilkinson might do well to reference these data sets on bushfires in Australia too before rattling off tweets about climate skeptics being smug. Happy to debate her on The Project anytime:

The number of times climate change is mentioned by our fire services before the crisis

NSW RFS budget – where the tax dollars go

$1bn dollars in extra Fire Service spending gone up in smoke?

VIC CFA – why does it have 3x the admin of NSWRFS to cover an area half the size?

WA DFES discusses what causes bushfires and it isn’t climate change

The Fire Services senior management act like a mafia

Volunteer Firefighters Association torches alarmist claims

BOM’s claim it was the hottest year on record in 2019 is untrue

BOM won’t release its methodology on reporting temperatures. Just believe us.

85% of BOM staff in senior management positions.

Shameless behavior at BOM over temperature measuring

Rules on fuel management permits

So the open offer stands to discuss your common sensical ooze. In order to empathize, she will need to look at the data objectively and unemotionally.

One final question, has your household signed up to Zali Steggall’s ‘Roadmap to Zero‘? I note she is up to 171 households now. 0.3% of the households in the electorate! Maybe 99.7% of Warringah residents are permanently smug?

XR now want to bankrupt Royal Dutch Shell

These pictures are of a Shell gasoline stand in Nijmegen, Holland.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) are now running a #ShellMustFall hashtag and campaign to trash Shell businesses with graffiti and bicycle locks on bowsers.

The sign reads, “Royal Dutch Shell, we will tax you, regulate you, split you up, socialize you, nationalize you, expropriate you, prosecute you and bankrupt you”

Has XR considered the livelihoods of the 82,000 employees at Shell?

No wonder the UK counter terrorism police wants to add these lunatics to the list.

XR claims to conduct non-violent civil disobedience but it’s actions are negatively impacting legitimate businesses from operating. Defacing private property is not peaceful. XR should be fined with the cost of policing and any lost revenues as a result of such selfish actions.

XR intends to disrupt the Shell shareholder meeting on May 19th.

This is not an expression of free speech but an intentional plan to intimidate. The longer governments let climate activists behave like this with little repercussions, the more emboldened they will become.

Extinction Rebellion trashes Auto Show

These climate activists are unhinged lunatics. This is the justification that Extinction Rebellion (XR) used for trashing the Brussels Autosalon was as follows,

The truth is, no car is green…The private car is no longer compatible with the Climate and Ecological Crisis….Governments must stop pouring billions into roads and instead make mass public transport affordable, accessible, reliable and convenient.

The Brussels Times reported that 187 were arrested and charged €2,000 each. Febiac, the auto show organizer, said XR’s display at the event caused a whopping €367,829 in damages.

There is a difference between protesting and breaking the law by trashing private property.

Febiac, to its credit, gave XR approval to protest under certain guidelines. The organizer’s Joost Kaesemans said, “We sat together with people from Extinction Rebellion for the salon, we told them they could hold a demo, sing songs and hand out brochures...But we also told them that if they bothered visitors and wreaked havoc, we would take measures. They did not stick to that, so there are consequences.”

So even when the organizers play ball, the fools of XR think they have carte blanche to act as they please. Hopefully XR protestors are forced to pay up, serve time and get handed a bill for wasting the time of the police.

If only XR protests were about saving the planet and not seek to control the way others live their lives.

One final question – does XR have a strategy to re-employ the 15mn that work in auto related industries? Of course not.

How many oil & gas companies ever advertised in the wokenist Guardian?

For such a spiteful alarmist newspaper, it is highly unlikely that many, if any oil and gas companies regularly advertised in The Guardian. So this token (woken) gesture speaks volumes about the virtue signaling nature of the rag. Presumably Rupert Murdoch will pick up those spoils? The management probably hasn’t thought of that.

While The Guardian might chalk it up as a victory, it is without doubt they are still powered largely by fossil fuels, including coal-fired power. It’s journalists no doubt use planes, cars and other forms of fossil fueled transport to produce their alarmist articles.

The Guardian proudly wrote,

ICYMI, we made an important announcement yesterday. We will no longer accept advertising from oil and gas companies, becoming the first major global news organisation to institute an outright ban on taking money from companies that extract fossil fuels. It will be implemented with immediate effect. https://gu.com/p/d6qq4/au

“Our decision is based on the decades-long efforts by many in that industry to prevent meaningful climate action by governments around the world,” the Guardian’s acting chief executive and chief revenue officer said in a joint statement. “It’s true that rejecting some adverts might make our lives a tiny bit tougher in the very short term. Nonetheless, we believe building a more purposeful organisation and remaining financially sustainable have to go hand in hand.”

In May last year we also updated our style guide to change the language we use to more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world. This is why we favour “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown” instead of “climate change”. We also favour saying “climate science denier or climate denier” instead of “climate sceptic”. https://gu.com/p/bfgxm/au

We will not stay quiet and we want the Guardian to play a leading role in reporting on the environmental catastrophe.

As we’ve reported in the past, The Guardian begs for charity after its articles because it’s content is not unique enough to attract a paying audience. It bats against the SMH and ABC for its readership- no palpable differentiation, even if the paper admits it loves using climate hyperbole.

As for being a “tiny bit tougher in the short term” on revenues it is probably as immeasurable as Australia’s impact on C02 in the atmosphere…i.e. 0.0000134%.

Get woke, go broke. Perhaps the paper should reflect on the quote from Rockefeller,

Charity is injurious unless it helps the recipient to become independent of it.”