#censorship

Phew, Glad Twitter cleared that up!

Oh, the irony!

Twitter’s public policy page has doth protested Ugandan ISPs blocking social media ahead of an election.

Didn’t Twitter actively engage in suppressing the NY Post’s expose of Hunter Biden‘s laptop ahead of the US presidential election?

Thank God we have Twitter defending the free speech & human rights of Ugandans before Americans.

So powerful have Big Tech companies become that they don’t even require a phone call from politicians to censor the opposition. It is decided by their own commissars.

Glad we cleared that up. Time for the UN to appoint Twitter to the chair of the Human Rights Commission without delay. Twitter should nominate Kathy Griffin given her unwavering balance.

Socialist Media – New Rules

JP Sears at it again with the censorship in social media.

Why the Mute Button will benefit Trump in the final debate

Problem solved? The debate moderators intend to have a mute button in the forthcoming debate to avoid interruption experienced in the first debate.

It sounds wonderful in principle, but we believe if the moderator is of sufficient ability, she shouldn’t require technological assistance to fall back on if her biases seek to stifle robust debate through balanced questioning and reasonable time to answer and redirect.

One can only imagine how fairly the mute button will be applied in the final show off between Trump and Biden on October 22nd given we know that the moderator, Kristen Welker, is staunchly in the Democrat camp.

We are sure when the microphone cut offs are tallied, Trump will outscore Biden on a 10:1 scale, if not more.

We have no doubt that Trump is the more likely of the two to interject but we think it will work in Trump’s favour to be cut off because we know that the deranged mainstream media will openly celebrate and applaud the idea of suppressing the free speech of someone they disagree with on a whim.

We don’t think that will play well to level headed Americans who want to hear and see the reactions of both candidates when pinned on the ropes. A good moderator would seek that type of courage under fire.

Unfortunately, the debate will likely end up being 3 on 1. Softballs will be tossed at Biden and hand grenades lobbed at Trump.

Should Trump leave the stage after being cut off countless times, we won’t be the least bit surprised. He will prove the point of just how biased the moderator was and how she relished the ability to muzzle the most powerful man in the world to feed her own derangement. She’ll prove his point about free speech. Never forget Reagan slammed a moderator for threatening to cut the mic in 1980.

If he leaves, the media will divert all attention to Trump as to why he did so and prove back to their faces that they have absolutely zero interest in objectivity other than to justify using authoritarian cancel culture tactics to silence and humiliate him.

As we like to say, journalistic integrity will only return when the mainstream media loves America more than they hate Trump.

Best they put this on full display.

Bongino goes thermonuclear on tech giants suppression of Hunter emails

Dan Bongino goes thermonuclear on the mainstream media and tech giant cover up of the NY Post allegations about Hunter Biden through suppression.

Hunter Biden is innocent until proven guilty but the sinister behaviour exhibited by the tech companies certainly doesn’t help paint a picture of squeaky clean behaviour.

We find it galling that these social media giants have never once hesitated to promote smears against Trump, no matter how wild the allegations.

As ever with the left, it is not the principle but the side that matters.

Sinister Big tech’s intentional election meddling

Big tech is determined to tell users what they deem is suitable for consumption. The top screen grab is from Facebook. Head of Comms, Andy Stone, made it clear the social media giant would curtail the Biden conflict of interest news story under the guise of ‘fact checking.’

The NY Post article that surfaced overnight revealed emails from Hunter Biden’s PC which showed he was leveraging his then VP father’s relationship with Ukrainians execs.

Twitter went to an even more interesting approach to suggest the NY Post link was “unsafe” to prevent views.

What we do know from history is that the more efforts made to cover one’s tracks, the more one guarantees to raise awareness to those problems on a stratospheric level.

Ultimately, big tech firms were granted immunity from prosecution as they promised to be mere hosts of content without fear or favour. Now that they are using discretionary editing, they should lose their sanctuary status and be liable to prosecution for suppressing free speech.

These are deep-seated liberal activist platforms. As businesses they are free to exercise commercial decisions. However they don’t have a right to flaunt laws without real world consequences.

Today big tech crossed a line and outed themselves as interfering in the election.

Chinese state TV cut feed when Pence was criticizing China

No guesses as to which party the Chinese Communist Party wishes to win the US election.

When VP Mike Pence spoke about China his feed was cut by state censors. When Senator Kamala Harris spoke, she was given full stream.

Censorship. No doubt the Chinese media played Kamala Harris’ claim that foreign leaders hold President Xi in higher regard than President Trump on a loop.

Censorship – a reminder of what we wrote 2 years ago

https://www.c-span.org/video/?474236-1/heads-facebook-amazon-apple-google-testify-antitrust-law

Two years ago we wrote about the leaked video of Google execs post the 2016 election and their promise to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

The testimony given to Congress by big-tech CEOs was so unconvincing. It was a joke. See for yourselves.

Twitter et al. Please don’t delete this video

Comedy gold.

A white BLM protestor tells Dr Immanuel (the woman being canceled over her comments about hydroxychloroquine) that he is blacker than her on the inside. This guys should run for Congress as he fits the Democratic Party platform.

It reminds us of the Babylon Bee parody about black people hiring white people to speak on their behalf.

So it clearly must be true about hydroxychloroquine for social media giants to remove links to it

As written earlier this morning, we didn’t think it would take long for the censors at Twitter, Facebook and YouTube to delete posts highlighting the findings of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFD) re COVID-19 and the claims of 100% success rates their members have been experiencing with hydroxychloroquine administered to coronavirus sufferers.

Recently, Twitter just stuck a violation notice with a fact-checker when it came to Trump. This time his tweet has been removed. By that measure, he must be on to something. Who would have thought that something he was incessantly mocked for might turn out to be true and have saved 10,000s of lives? It is as if the media wants the highest possible death toll to ensure he doesn’t win a second term.

Weren’t social media platforms gifted sanctuary status on the basis of being just hosts to content? Now that editorial bias is openly exercised by social media giants, they should lose that right.

Surely if the content pushed by the AFD was false, why not use their immense power to publish the counterfactual to each of the false claims instead of deleting it from public discourse. Surely people have the right to make up their own minds to assess content. Alas, we will be told what we can consume. It is for our own good, you understand! We are not deemed intelligent enough to assess such matters.

The consistent action exercised by social media giants to silence conservatives/stories running counter to narratives is not lost on people as it only raises suspicions and piques interest to hunt for the very things that are removed. 

Keep up the good work censors – we sincerely hope that sanctuary status is removed. You have truly earned it.