Mainstream media

Says more about Fauci than Trump

If principles were so high on Dr Fauci’s agenda, why didn’t he resign and publicly out Trump for all his wicked ways at the time he felt silenced? Was he enjoying the limelight of being in a position of power and privilege too much to do so?

Vice wrote that Fauci feels “liberated” now he works for President Biden.

Fauci said,

I can tell you I take no pleasure at all being in a situation of contradicting the president so it was really something that you didn’t feel that you could actually say something...”

Yet Fauci previously said of Trump,

The president [Trump] has listened to what I have said and to what the other people on the task force have said…when I have made recommendations he has taken them. He has never countered or overridden me…

Which is it? The second comment hardly sounds like someone muzzled by a crazed tyrant.

Don’t forget that Fauci was originally against masks as a preventive and then for them when it was politically expedient to do so. So inconsistency is a hallmark.

Now that Trump has gone, is Fauci jumping on the “trash Trump at any opportunity” cancel culture bandwagon because he’s now got a new master who welcomes criticism of his predecessor and allowed him to keep his job? Sounds like it.

Was Fauci worried that Trump might win the election and resigning early would have left him with egg on his face? Or did he just hedge his bets like he has done with so much of his advice?

Vice’s article says way more about who is really telling fibs. But of course, we can’t expect any journalistic integrity from the left wing media to call him out on his conflicting remarks.

Australia Day – feel free to have your own minute’s silence

It is that time of the year again. Australia Day. Time for the woke brigade to shame any Aussies thinking of firing up the BBQ and sinking a few beers with friends and family. If some people don’t want to celebrate it, then they’re free not to. But what is the point of making people feel guilty for something they didn’t do to people they never knew 150 years before many were born?

Our local member in the House of Reps, Zali Steggall OAM, has called for a minute’s silence on Australia Day. By all means, if she feels that way, she should go right ahead and make her personal statement. Just quit the vacuous virtue signaling.

We’ll dismiss it with the same out-of-touch “Roadmap to Zero” program she has running in Warringah. You know, the climate change virtue signaling page where well over 98.5% of households in the electorate haven’t even bothered to sign up, despite her insistence that the gas guzzling SUV drivers of Mosman elected her to put a stop to climate change.

When are we going to drop this shaming every year? Why is Cricket Australia (CA) now buying into woke antics, especially that of a foreigners violent Marxist group? Can anyone in CA management point to any data or conclusive studies which prove the lives of indigenous Australians will improve by dropping the name or the date? Surely all 365 days of the year should be deemed invasion day if January 26th is considered so reprehensible.

Cricket Australia’s Mel Jones said, “We’ve got five Indigenous players playing those games and a lot of Indigenous fans that come to the cricket, we just want to make this space as safe and inclusive as possible.”

What could be more inclusive than watching cricket over a few beers? Surely CA’s focus should be on winning after the drubbing against India but toxic identity politics is front and centre. Wallabies anyone?

Honestly, can CA identify the fans by name who feel triggered when they voluntarily pay hard-earned coin to watch cricket matches? The Aboriginal & Torres Strait Island flags adorn major cricket venues. Every game. Is that not inclusive?

But why can’t those who want to change the date get the facts straight on Australia Day?

Australia Day is celebrated on the 26th January for a very good reason.

The First Fleet arrived in Botany Bay on the 20th of January and an expedition party was sent to Port Jackson on the 22nd of January with the rest of the fleet following on the 26th of January. So the “day” Australia was technically invaded was almost a week prior.

On January 26th, 1949, Australian nationality came into existence when the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 was enacted. That was the day we were first called Australians and allowed to travel with passports as Australians rather than British subjects. Hence Australia Day was officially born and celebrated.

Under the Nationality Act 1920 (Cth), all Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders born after January 1, 1921, gained the status of British subjects. In 1949, therefore, they automatically became Australian citizens under the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948.

So for all the protestors and virtue signaling groups trying to win woke points, perhaps they should spend that minute silence learning the actual dates of what they’re protesting.

Maybe Aussies can strike a deal. Will the activists promise that they’ll stop protesting forever on this issue if the date is changed to one of their choosing? Of course they can’t. Moving the date would embolden the mob to push more grievance politics. Remember that many of the protestors don’t represent the majority of the people they claim to represent. As is usually the case with most protestors.

The overwhelming majority of Aussies are fair minded people aware of their history. The government is so aware that those minority groups are paid 6% of the national budget, twice the level of their representative population. Every year. Shame on Cricket Australia. Stick to the core product and stop telling the fans how they should participate when they part with cold hard cash.

Media fawns over Biden – video montage

https://fb.watch/397ra_VLZt/

While it comes as absolutely no surprise, the media gushed and fawned over President Joe Biden’s inauguration. Take a look at this nauseating video montage welcoming the new White House occupant.

We honestly wonder how the media will cope as they wean themselves off 5 years of complete derangement. Listen to the contrast of how they sent off Trump today.

Can Americans live on a diet of news filtered through rose-tinted glasses?

Take your pick

Take your pick.

Senator Chuck Schumer implied the Capitol riots ranked up there with Pearl Harbor. Arnold Schwarzenegger likened it to Kristallnacht. Now ex FBI Director Jim Comey thinks it was a Chernobyl.

If a true disaster hits America, what will it be compared to?

Good to see the media make absolutely no effort to issue an “are you serious?” question to these audacious claims.

As complicit as ever, await all the ‘Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are saviors who make Mother Teresa’s achievements look as impactful as a highway cafe diner waitress pouring free refills’ puff pieces from the media. Reach for the nearest bucket.

The media will preach unity while they simultaneously flip the bird to 74million Americans who they disagree with as the problem dividing America.

We wish the Biden Administration the very best of luck for all the right reasons but we fear his agenda will drive an even larger wedge which will send the country over the abyss when it comes to free, open and inclusive discourse.

Trump was the catalyst. Americans have just reappointed the cause. Buyers remorse.

Another reason I don’t read The Ecommunist (in pictures)

There was a time when I used to enjoy a business trip abroad. That would enable me to hoover every word in The Economist. From cover to cover. It was great reading. And informative. I always knew I would learn something interesting. Punchy journalism that was well researched and entertained both sides of an argument.

Now it is little more than an activist rag. It hates Trump (even before he took office). Every second article seems to be about climate change or another social justice topic du jour. Anti-Brexit. Anti-America First. Anti-coal. Anti-Tory. Pro-China. Pro-Corbyn. Pro 16-yo kids getting voting rights. Pro-globalism. Check out these covers over the last 5 or so years. 

If one thing rings absolutely true, we should never judge a magazine by its cover. Hint: And The Economist has always published excellent covers. 

THE ECONOMIST 2020 PORTADA OFICIAL ANALISIS COMPLETO - YouTube
There is nothing wrong with a game having a political ...
The Economist (Digital) Magazine - DiscountMags.com
The Economist Magazine - DiscountMags.com
Tracking Trump, presidential candidate: Donald Trump's ...
The Economist Speaks With US President Donald Trump About ...
Jeremy Corbyn featured on the cover of The Economist ...
The Economist Magazine - DiscountMags.com
Trump's Kiss on Putin's Cheek in The Economist's Latest Cover
The Economist UK — January 13, 2018 PDF download free
Xi Jinping has more clout than Donald Trump. The world ...
5327-the-economist-Cover-2015-December-Issue.jpg
20161126_cover_ww
The Economist: In Trump's America It May Be A Long Wait ...
Cover-Star Donald Trump: Das sind die besten Titelbilder ...
20161001_cover_ww

The socialist ‘Red Flag‘ magazine should be livid that The Economist has encroached on its turf. From the top of the journalism totem pole towards the bottom in a little over a decade, exacerbated by Trump’s term in office. 

WaPo’s Jennifer Rubin celebrates America Last

So wonderful to see the true colours of the left.

Recall WaPo opinion writer, Jennifer Rubin, demanded that Walter Reed Hospital be defunded after Trump convalesced there.

What makes her think her opinion is valid in any context about the outgoing administration given the chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome she suffers from? The self-belief in her comments are worthy of addition to the DSM-VI.

This was her other tweet highlighting the utter impartiality in her own mind.

Journalism has been dead for the last 4 years. It will be a rotting corpse for the next 4.

We await all the mainstream media puff pieces on all the America Last policies that Biden will introduce – Rejoin Paris, re-sign a deal with Iran, path the citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants, $15min wages etc – as good for the country.

CNN contributor suggests certain conservative media be deplatformed

You have to hand it to CNN. A contributor on Brian Stelter’s program believed that deplatforming OAN and Newsmax made sense to stop the spread of misinformation.

CNN, one of the biggest purveyors of twisted narratives, would love to take out networks with higher ratings. Having said that, does CNN realize that those who watch OAN or Newsmax probably won’t be coming to watch the left-leaning network as an alternative? Taking out competitors probably ends up helping other conservative networks because it is the “content” the audience seeks. Best deplatform them too.

Still, it is no surprise to hear cancel culture is alive and kicking at CNN. Where the network believes audiences aren’t intelligent enough to consume information and decide for themselves what is truth or fiction.

Media already holding new administration to account

While the mainstream media released starving lions every time a Trump administration official was interviewed, just look at the fluffy miniature poodles set upon VP-elect Kamala Harris in this catch up.

Surely America has been waiting to know more about Harris’ sneakers than what she will do with her vote in the hung Senate!

Amazon said Parler move was in good faith

https://fb.watch/2ZUoqh2Yfy/

Amazon said its move to ditch Parler from its AWS platform was done in good faith. So much good faith that it decided with the best intentions to leak the letter to left-wing media site, Buzzfeed, before sending it to the intended recipient, Parler.

Impeccable ethics and corporate integrity right there. Who doesn’t leak important legal documents before sending to the addressee?

Stuff your outrage Libs

MRCTV’s Britt Hughes highlights the left’s outrage over the storming of Capitol Hill. Never mind the celebratory mood they’ve shown for the last 3 years over violence perpetrated by their own.