Amazing what pesky facts can do to destroy narratives. How is it that an organization which receives $1m a day can’t even look at historical data recorded before all this climate alarmist malarkey ever existed? Yes, days were hotter in 1910 and 1896.
If the Bureau of Meteorology had a shred of credibility it would at the very least be making reference to recorded temperatures prior to 1910, even if it hasn’t been taken by them. Not the first time the BOM has been caught making grandiose statements.
It’s nothing short of disgraceful. A complicit media just plays the alarmist’s tune. Politicians then set stupid policy based on fudged reporting.